gmat機(jī)經(jīng),7-8月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AA(至7.31)(八).

　　以下澳際留學(xué)更新2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以下2011年7月-8月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

15. 題庫6---企業(yè)在尋找新的商機(jī)或位置時(shí)應(yīng)該去Helios城那個(gè)，是原題。

The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.

“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”

Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

6. 一份面向地方生活的雜志上的一篇文章： 企業(yè)在尋找新的商機(jī)或位置時(shí)應(yīng)該去Helios城。甚至在最近的衰退中，Helios的失業(yè)率也比地區(qū)平均水平低，它是地區(qū)的工業(yè)中心，歷史上它提供的比它在地區(qū)制造業(yè)工作中分享的份額中更多。而且，Helios正試圖通過吸引研究和發(fā)展革新技術(shù)的公司來擴(kuò)張它的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)。

提供觀點(diǎn)：

1. 作者認(rèn)為應(yīng)該到該地區(qū)建廠理由是這里的失業(yè)率很高。但是卻沒有給出因果關(guān)系。從常理來看這是沒有道理的因?yàn)槭I(yè)率高的地方可能更難雇傭到雇員從而使成本增加。

2. 作者認(rèn)為該地區(qū)會(huì)鼓勵(lì)研發(fā)，所以應(yīng)該到該地區(qū)投資。但事實(shí)上就象作者說的那樣該地區(qū)是制造業(yè)中心怎么可能有很多對技術(shù)和科研很熟練的人員。

1， 因?yàn)镠地區(qū)industrial and manufacturing比較attractive，所以那里的工人很可能只適合做這類的，如果缺乏能夠做innovative technologies and research的工人labor pool，那么很可能導(dǎo)致失敗。

2， H的低失業(yè)率更可能成為壞處。因?yàn)楸热缬衛(wèi)ess available work force。企業(yè)必須提高wage才能吸引他們。提高了COST。

3， 錯(cuò)誤的假設(shè)過去的成功能夠代表未來。比方說已經(jīng)飽和的資源、過分的競爭、以及可能出現(xiàn)的錯(cuò)誤政策，都可能導(dǎo)致H地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟(jì)不再發(fā)達(dá)。

In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the region’s manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, forts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.

To begin with, it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.

Another problem with the available work force is its size. Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.

In conclusion, the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocate. In fact, the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities to choose Helios.

16. JJ上有的，就是那個(gè)某公司在去年給公司manager們都在各自家里配備了電腦和電話，好像是今年發(fā)現(xiàn)利潤漲了。Author就推斷是這個(gè)方案起作用了阿，那些managers因?yàn)橄掳嗪筮€能在家辦公所以工作效率提高了，author就建議其他公司也效仿同樣做法給員工在家配備電腦，這樣可能利潤就能大漲了。

題庫原題：97. The following appeared as part of an article in a computer magazine.

“A year ago Apex Manufacturing bought its managers computers for their homes and paid for telephone connections so that the managers could access Apex computers and data files from home after normal business hours. Since last year, productivity at Apex has increased by 15 percent. Other companies can learn from the success at Apex: given home computers and access to company resources, employees will work additional hours at home and thereby increase company profits.”

電腦雜志的文章： 一年前Apex制造公司給它的經(jīng)理們在家買了電腦，并支付電話費(fèi)，這樣他們就可以在工作時(shí)間以外從家里連接到Apex的電腦和數(shù)據(jù)文件。從去年開始，Apex的生產(chǎn)能力增長了15%。其他公司可以借鑒Apex的成功，提供家用電腦和到公司資源的鏈接，雇員會(huì)在家里加班并提高公司利潤。

思路分析：

Notice that only managers were bought computers by Apex, whose productivity indeed rose 15 percent as the result. It is different from the assumption made in the article, which stated that if all employees were brought computers, they would work extra hours at home. Managers ≠ all employees

A. This argument suffers from a fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

B. Next, the author fails to provide any evidence that installing home computers for managers really led to the increase of Apex’s productivity.

思路參考：

1 home access 和increase productivity因果關(guān)系錯(cuò)誤

2 就算有關(guān)系，productity增加也不代表profits會(huì)增加

3 就算以上都對，用去年來推今后也是錯(cuò)的

4 hasty generalization。有兩個(gè)，一是把apex推廣到所有公司，二是把managers推廣到了所有employees

論點(diǎn)： 1，錯(cuò)誤的analogous 類比，各公司是不同滴，不能照搬滴； 2，利潤漲了就推斷是這個(gè)方案起的作用是沒有根據(jù)的。。。

北美范文

In this article the author attributes Apex Manufacturing’s 15 percent increase in productivity over the past year to its decision to equip its manager with computers and paid telephone connections for their homes so that they would access company computers and files from home after normal business hours. On the basis of Apex’s experience the author recommends that other companies follow Apex’s example and provide computers and access to company resources to their employees. The author believes that such a policy would increase productivity and profits for other companies, just as it did for Apex. The author’s line of reasoning is questionable for several reasons.

First, the author assumes that Apex’s increase in productivity is due to its equipping its managers with home computers and access to company resources. However, the only evidence offered in support of this claim is the fact that Apex’s increase in productivity occurred after the home computers and after-hours (adv. 工作完畢后) access was provided. Unfortunately, this evidence is insufficient to establish the causal claim in question. While temporal precedence is one of the conditions required to establish a causal relationship between two events, by itself it is not a sufficient condition. Consequently, it is possible that Apex’s increase in productivity is not related to its decision to equip its managers with computers and after-hours access in the fashion required by the author’s argument.

Second, the author assumes that Apex and other companies are sufficiently similar to warrant a conclusion based on an analogy between them. Even if we accept the view that Apex’s increase in productivity was brought about by its policy of enabling its managers to work from home, differences between Apex and other companies could nullify this result. Lacking detailed information about Apex and the other companies in question it is difficult to assess the author’s conclusion.

　　以上澳際留學(xué)更新2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以上2011年7月-8月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　以下澳際留學(xué)更新2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以下2011年7月-8月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

15. 題庫6---企業(yè)在尋找新的商機(jī)或位置時(shí)應(yīng)該去Helios城那個(gè)，是原題。

The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.

“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”

Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

6. 一份面向地方生活的雜志上的一篇文章： 企業(yè)在尋找新的商機(jī)或位置時(shí)應(yīng)該去Helios城。甚至在最近的衰退中，Helios的失業(yè)率也比地區(qū)平均水平低，它是地區(qū)的工業(yè)中心，歷史上它提供的比它在地區(qū)制造業(yè)工作中分享的份額中更多。而且，Helios正試圖通過吸引研究和發(fā)展革新技術(shù)的公司來擴(kuò)張它的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)。

提供觀點(diǎn)：

1. 作者認(rèn)為應(yīng)該到該地區(qū)建廠理由是這里的失業(yè)率很高。但是卻沒有給出因果關(guān)系。從常理來看這是沒有道理的因?yàn)槭I(yè)率高的地方可能更難雇傭到雇員從而使成本增加。

2. 作者認(rèn)為該地區(qū)會(huì)鼓勵(lì)研發(fā)，所以應(yīng)該到該地區(qū)投資。但事實(shí)上就象作者說的那樣該地區(qū)是制造業(yè)中心怎么可能有很多對技術(shù)和科研很熟練的人員。

1， 因?yàn)镠地區(qū)industrial and manufacturing比較attractive，所以那里的工人很可能只適合做這類的，如果缺乏能夠做innovative technologies and research的工人labor pool，那么很可能導(dǎo)致失敗。

2， H的低失業(yè)率更可能成為壞處。因?yàn)楸热缬衛(wèi)ess available work force。企業(yè)必須提高wage才能吸引他們。提高了COST。

3， 錯(cuò)誤的假設(shè)過去的成功能夠代表未來。比方說已經(jīng)飽和的資源、過分的競爭、以及可能出現(xiàn)的錯(cuò)誤政策，都可能導(dǎo)致H地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟(jì)不再發(fā)達(dá)。 上1234下

共4頁