gmat機經(jīng)8-9月gmat作文機經(jīng)AA(至8.25)(十).

　　過去的10年里，桔類水果的價格實際上上升了。11年前，Megamart每個檸檬要價5分，現(xiàn)在一般要價為30分一個。過去11年只有一年不適合桔類水果生長。顯然，柑桔種植者應該對桔類水果價格過度上漲負責。為防止他們繼續(xù)哄抬價格規(guī)范價格規(guī)定很有必要。

　　考古

　　提供觀點：

　　1， 小范圍推大范圍。

　　2， 忽略他因，是否只有一種因素導致價格上升——不適合生長。。。還有，比如環(huán)境保護，加工價格上升，人力成本上升，或者單純的物價上漲。。。monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions

　　1， 檸檬缺乏代表性，或者說，檸檬有其特殊性，譬如檸檬都是進口的，比較貴;

　　2， 天氣好不一定代表物價要低，因為種植柑橘的農(nóng)民已經(jīng)動用了可用的資源了，產(chǎn)量無法再多了;

　　3， 是否物價高就是農(nóng)民肆意抬高的緣故，可能是dealers在其中的作用;

　　政府是否要介入，雖然價格變貴了，但是targeted customers沒有變化，對整個國民經(jīng)濟影響不大

　　北美范文：

　　In this editorial the author argues for the imposition of strict pricing regulations in order to prevent citrus growers from continued inflation of prices of citrus fruit. The need for such regulation is supported by the author’s contention that citrus growers have been unnecessarily raising prices of citrus fruit in the past. The evidence for this allegation is the fact that the price of lemons at Megamart has increased from 15 cents per pound to over a dollar a pound during the preceding 11-year period. The author maintains that this increase is unjustifiable because weather conditions have been favorable to citrus production in all but one of those years. This argument is flawed for several reasons.

　　First and foremost, the author assumes that the only factor that influences the price of citrus fruit is the weather. Other factors such as monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions are completely ignored as possible sources for the increase. The charge that citrus growers have unnecessarily raised prices can be sustained only if these and other possible factors can be completely ruled out as contributing to the price increases. Since the author fails to address these factors, the recommendation calling for strict pricing regulations can be dismissed out of hand as frivolous.

　　Second, the author assumes that the only way to combat increased prices is through government intervention. In a free enterprise system many other means of affecting the pricing of goods are available. For example, boycotting a product and thereby influencing supply and demand conditions of the commodity is an fective means of influencing the price of the product. In a free market economy the call for price regulation by the government should occur only when all other means to rectify the problem have been exhausted.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument it would be necessary to show that the only factor influencing the price increases is the growers’ desire for increased profits.

　　以上澳際留學更新2011年gmat機經(jīng)，以上2011年8月-9月gmat作文機經(jīng)更新，AA，8月20日至8月25日，共37題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　以下澳際留學更新2011gmat機經(jīng)，以下2011年8月-9月gmat作文機經(jīng)更新，AA，8月20日至8月25日，共37題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　26.就是大學校內(nèi)的醫(yī)院沒有社區(qū)醫(yī)院或者私人醫(yī)院好

　　題庫原題：43. The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.

　　“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”

　　范文：

　　In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

　　The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.

　　Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.

　　Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.

上1234下

共4頁