gmat機(jī)經(jīng)8-9月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至8.26)(九).

　　以下澳際留學(xué)更新2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以下2011年8月-9月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AI，8月20日至8月26日，共42題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　31 本月機(jī)經(jīng)2次

　　員工是否有權(quán)利設(shè)計(jì)自己的workshop

　　原題：“Since the physical work environment affects employee productivity and morale, the employees themselves should have the right to decide how their workplace is designed.”(68)

　　提供觀點(diǎn)：

　　1. brings creativity and coziness

　　2. makes colleagues more closely and companionate

　　3. Admittedly, some companies such as consulting/consultant? company must avoid too much decoration.

　　However, no matter the employee or the employer, as for the environment is considered, compromise should be made from time to time.

　　View1: work character has great influence on the design of workplace.

　　Evidence: consulting company must avoid too much decoration in order to appear professionally and dependably. To some creative work such as AD agency and fashion design, the decorating of workplace is important not only for simulating inspirations but also for showing creative abilities.

　　View2: also, the designment of workplace should be compromise to company culture.

　　Evidence: Consider the influence it has done to co-workers and the harmony in work place.

　　北美范文：

　　I agree that physical workspace can affect morale and productivity and that, as a result, employees should have a significant voice in how their work areas are designed. However, the speaker suggests that each employee should have full autonomy over his or her immediate workspace, I think this view is too extreme, for it ignores two important problems that allowing too much freedom over workspace can create.

　　On the one hand, I agree that some aspects of workspace design are best lt to the individual prerences of each worker. Location of personal tools and materials, style and size of desk chair, and even desk lighting and decorative desk items, can each play an important role in a worker’s comfort, psychological wellbeing, concentration, and ficiency. Moreover, these features involve highly subjective prerences, so it would be inappropriate for anyone but the worker to make such choices.

　　On the other hand, control over one’s immediate workspace should not go unchecked, for two reasons. First, one employee’s workspace design may inconvenience, annoy, or even offend nearby coworkers. For example, pornographic pinups may distract some coworkers and offend others, thereby impeding productivity, fostering ill-will and resentment, and increasing attrition—all to the detriment of the company. Admittedly, the consequences of most workspace choices would not be so far-reaching. Still, in my observation many people adhere, consciously or not, to the adage that one person’s rights extend only so far as the next person’s nose. A second problem with affording too much workspace autonomy occurs when workspaces are not clearly delineated—by walls and doors—or when workers share an immediate workspace. In such cases, giving all workers concurrent authority would perpetuate conflict and undermine productivity.

　　In conclusion, although employees should have the freedom to arrange their work areas, this freedom is not absolute. Managers would be well-advised to arbitrate workspace disputes and, if needed, assume authority to make final decisions about workspace design.

　　32.本月機(jī)經(jīng)2次

　　原題：Financial benit should be the most important factor when choosing a career(31)

　　提供觀點(diǎn)：

　　1. 把收入作為選擇職業(yè)的首要考慮因素會(huì)使人忽視了生命中更應(yīng)該追求的其他東西。事實(shí)上有許多人為了追求更為重要的目標(biāo)而放棄了使自己獲得最大收入的職業(yè)。象是特蕾莎修女，她以助人為快樂(lè)。盡管在物質(zhì)上是清貧的但是卻在別人快樂(lè)的同時(shí)自己也得到了幸福的回報(bào)。Mother Teresa, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, dedicated the majority of her life to helping the poorest of the poor in India. Although she was not rich all through her life, she was happier than most of her contemporaries because she gained happiness when she helped the poor. bliss blessedness 還有一些人為了做全職家長(zhǎng)更好的照顧孩子更是完全犧牲了得到錢(qián)的職業(yè)。在他們看來(lái)和家人在一起生活照顧他們的起居飲食是自己最開(kāi)心的事情。

　　2. 誠(chéng)然經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)是一切其他活動(dòng)的前提，但追求錢(qián)以外更重要的目標(biāo)并不一定意味著就會(huì)得不到物質(zhì)回報(bào)或者是一定會(huì)過(guò)得潦倒。事實(shí)上兩者是可以相互促進(jìn)的。一個(gè)追求智力上或者是創(chuàng)造力上的成就的人象是作家藝術(shù)家或者是音樂(lè)家當(dāng)他們的作品問(wèn)世時(shí)候他們同時(shí)也得到了物質(zhì)的回報(bào)。others choose to pursue intellectual or creative fulfillment-as writers, artists, or musicians. 而這些錢(qián)反過(guò)來(lái)又會(huì)為他們的創(chuàng)作提供更好的條件和環(huán)境.

　　ignore, overlook, neglect; pursue, go in for, in pursuit of, aspire after, be down and out mutually, come out, be published, priority, primarily; appreciate, notion, profession, lucrative, stem from subordinate ... to ...

　　recreation physical health psychological making money is not an end in the end of itself. acknowledge strike a balance overriding高于一切的 factor

　　1. Admittedly, 人們都不是生活在童話里fairy tale，人們需要面對(duì)日常生活中的各種花費(fèi)，而金錢(qián)是保障這一切，從而保障人們生命的基礎(chǔ)。financial gain does be an important factor in choosing a career.

　　2. 但是，這不代表說(shuō)，所有人都應(yīng)該把它regard it as the most important…因?yàn)閍fter all, 金錢(qián)只是滿足我們生活的手段，還有更多更家重要的東西，金錢(qián)無(wú)法滿足。比如精神生活：首先，很多人選擇很多工作，造福社會(huì)，但它們pay less than others，比如social work, nursing. 人們認(rèn)為精神世界更重要，幫助別人。。。;另外，良好的工作環(huán)境，同事關(guān)系，使人們精神好。

　　3. 因?yàn)槭紫龋翰煌擞胁煌男枰直热缯f(shuō)，有的媽媽為了照顧孩子，選擇地點(diǎn)離家比較近的工作，even though this job can provide her less money than those far from her home.。。再比如說(shuō)，有的人為了事業(yè)上更大的成就，會(huì)選擇能提供更多機(jī)會(huì)promotion，或者培訓(xùn)之類的。如果全部考慮金錢(qián)，則很可能喪失更多進(jìn)步的機(jī)會(huì)。

　　View1: Financial gain is an important factor in choosing a career.

　　View2: However, there are more factors play important roles in making job decisions. chance for promotion, training, work environment, corporate culture and reputation, welfare other than financial form

　　Evidence: Vincent Van Gogh .If he transfer to other career for monetary consideration, there will be no such beautiful scenes as starry night and sunflowers shining forever in our art history.

　　View3: In my opinion, the best career is the combination of special interests and financial benits.

　　北美范文：

　　Financial gain is certainly one factor to consider when selecting a career. But many people do not, and should not, focus on this factor as the main one. The role that money plays in career choice should depend on the priorities, goals and values of the particular person making the choice.

　　The main problem with selecting a career primarily on the basis of money is that for many people to do so would be to ignore one’s personal values, needs, and larger life goals. Indeed, many people appreciate this notion when they choose their career. For example, some people join one of the helping professions, such as nursing, teaching or social work, well aware that their career will not be financially lucrative. Their choice properly stems from an overriding altruistic desire, not from an interest in financial gain. Others choose to pursue intellectual or creative fulfillment—as writers, artists, or musicians—knowing that they are trading off dollars for non-tangible rewards. Still others forego economic gain to work as full-time parents; for these people, family and children are of paramount importance in life. Finally, many people subordinate economic prospects to their desire to live in a particular location; these people may place a high value on recreation, their physical health, or being near a circle of friends.

　　Another problem with focusing primarily on money when selecting a career is that it ignores the notion that making money is not an end in the end of itself, but rather a means of obtaining material goods and services and of attaining important goals—such as providing security for oneself and one’s family, lifelong learning, or freedom to travel or to pursue hobbies. Acknowledging the distinction, one may nevertheless select a career on the basis of money—since more money can buy more goods and services as well as the security, freedom, and time to enjoy them. Even so, one must strike a balance, for if these things that money is supposed to provide are sacrificed in the pursuit of money itself, the point of having money—and of one’s career selection—has been lost.

　　In conclusion, economic gain should not be the overriding factor in selecting a career. While for a few people the single-minded pursuit of wealth may be fulfillment enough, most people should, and indeed do, temper the pursuit of wealth against other values, goals, and priorities. Moreover, they recognize that money is merely a means to more important objectives, and that the pursuit itself may undermine the achievement of these objectives.

　　33. 本月機(jī)經(jīng)2次

　　原題：“Everywhere, it seems, there are clear and positive signs that people are becoming more respectful of one another’s differences.”

　　提供觀點(diǎn)：

　　基本同意作者的觀點(diǎn)

　　1. 一方面我們的立法越來(lái)越完善不斷向著消除歧視和偏見(jiàn)的方向發(fā)展。這從強(qiáng)制的方面要求人們尊重和其他人的不同

　　2. 另一方面，隨著技術(shù)的不斷進(jìn)步交流的不斷深入人們對(duì)別的文化也有了更深的了解。而了解就會(huì)使得不同文化的人們提高對(duì)對(duì)方文化和行為的自發(fā)的非強(qiáng)制的尊重。

　　3. 誠(chéng)然現(xiàn)在還有很多的種族的性別的等各個(gè)方面的歧視。但是我們很高興地看到事情在向好的方面發(fā)展。

　　1、 The increased globalization has provided more opportunities than ever bore to contact and acknowledge cultures of other nations. 對(duì)于不同的宗教信仰和文化習(xí)俗，人們采取了更加寬容more tolerant attitude toward dissimilar culture, including religion and custom from other nations. 比方說(shuō)：China had long closed itself to the outside of the world for many centuries bore it opened the door in 1980’s. 在那段時(shí)間里，西方文明被簡(jiǎn)單地理解為怪異和粗魯?shù)腸onsidered to be strange or rude. 而現(xiàn)在，接觸了更多后，中國(guó)也認(rèn)識(shí)到了不同，并且充分地接受和借鑒even learn from他們。

　　2、 然而，在很多領(lǐng)域，盡管通過(guò)legislation，已經(jīng)改變了一些to some extent，但嚴(yán)重的discrimination and prejudice still remain severe despite of the legislation… 比方說(shuō)，racial, gender雖然立法規(guī)定了男女在工作一樣的情況下得到一樣工資，但是社會(huì)人為地perceived inequity still exist since 男和女被分為不同種類的工作。

　　3、 有成績(jī)，但仍然需要努力。對(duì)不同的高度容忍體現(xiàn)文明的發(fā)展程度。sign of… 之類。所以要一起努力。

　　來(lái)自北美范文：

　　In determining whether we are becoming more respectful of one another’s differences, one must examine both overt actions and underlying motives, as well as examining whether our differences are increasing or decreasing. The issue, therore, is quite complex, and the answer is unclear.

　　Disrespect for one another’s differences manifests itself in various forms of prejudice and discrimination. Since the civil rights and feminist movements of the 60s and 70s, it would seem that we have made significant progress toward eliminating racial and sexual discrimination. Anti-discriminatory laws in the areas of employment, housing, and education, now protect all significant minority groups racial minorities and women, the physically challenged and, more recently, homosexuals. Movies and television shows, which for better or worse have become the cynosure of our cultural attention, now tout the rights of minorities, encouraging acceptance of and respect for others.

　　However, much of this progress is forced upon us legislative. Without Title 10 and its progenies, would we voluntarily rrain from the discriminatory behavior that the laws prevent? Perhaps not. Moreover, signs of disrespect are all around us today. Extreme factions still rally around bigoted demagogues; the number of “hate crimes” is increasing alarmingly; and school-age children seem to flaunt a disrespect toward adults as never bore. Finally, what appears to be respect for one another’s differences may in fact be an increasing global homogeneity—that is, we are becoming more and more alike.

　　In sum, on a societal level it is difficult to distinguish between genuine respect for one another’s differences on the one hand and legislated morality and increasing homogeneity on the other. Accordingly, the claim that we are becoming more respectful of one another’s differences is somewhat dubious.

　　以上澳際留學(xué)更新2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以上2011年8月-9月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AI，8月20日至8月26日，共42題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　以下澳際留學(xué)更新2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，以下2011年8月-9月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)更新，AI，8月20日至8月26日，共42題。希望大家的gmat考試順利!

　　31 本月機(jī)經(jīng)2次

　　員工是否有權(quán)利設(shè)計(jì)自己的workshop

　　原題：“Since the physical work environment affects employee productivity and morale, the employees themselves should have the right to decide how their workplace is designed.”(68)

　　提供觀點(diǎn)：

　　1. brings creativity and coziness

　　2. makes colleagues more closely and companionate

　　3. Admittedly, some companies such as consulting/consultant? company must avoid too much decoration.

　　However, no matter the employee or the employer, as for the environment is considered, compromise should be made from time to time.

　　View1: work character has great influence on the design of workplace.

　　Evidence: consulting company must avoid too much decoration in order to appear professionally and dependably. To some creative work such as AD agency and fashion design, the decorating of workplace is important not only for simulating inspirations but also for showing creative abilities.

　　View2: also, the designment of workplace should be compromise to company culture.

　　Evidence: Consider the influence it has done to co-workers and the harmony in work place.

　　北美范文：

　　I agree that physical workspace can affect morale and productivity and that, as a result, employees should have a significant voice in how their work areas are designed. However, the speaker suggests that each employee should have full autonomy over his or her immediate workspace, I think this view is too extreme, for it ignores two important problems that allowing too much freedom over workspace can create.

　　On the one hand, I agree that some aspects of workspace design are best lt to the individual prerences of each worker. Location of personal tools and materials, style and size of desk chair, and even desk lighting and decorative desk items, can each play an important role in a worker’s comfort, psychological wellbeing, concentration, and ficiency. Moreover, these features involve highly subjective prerences, so it would be inappropriate for anyone but the worker to make such choices.

　　On the other hand, control over one’s immediate workspace should not go unchecked, for two reasons. First, one employee’s workspace design may inconvenience, annoy, or even offend nearby coworkers. For example, pornographic pinups may distract some coworkers and offend others, thereby impeding productivity, fostering ill-will and resentment, and increasing attrition—all to the detriment of the company. Admittedly, the consequences of most workspace choices would not be so far-reaching. Still, in my observation many people adhere, consciously or not, to the adage that one person’s rights extend only so far as the next person’s nose. A second problem with affording too much workspace autonomy occurs when workspaces are not clearly delineated—by walls and doors—or when workers share an immediate workspace. In such cases, giving all workers concurrent authority would perpetuate conflict and undermine productivity.

　　In conclusion, although employees should have the freedom to arrange their work areas, this freedom is not absolute. Managers would be well-advised to arbitrate workspace disputes and, if needed, assume authority to make final decisions about workspace design.

上123下

共3頁(yè)