GMAT機經(jīng),2017年5月GMAT作文機經(jīng)AA(至5.11)(十一).

以下GMAT機經(jīng)為澳際留學獨家整理，轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處，若無注明發(fā)現(xiàn)必究!

以下澳際留學獨家整理發(fā)布2011年GMAT機經(jīng)整理，以下2011年5月GMAT作文機經(jīng)，AA篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月11日，共36題。澳際留學祝同學們GMAT考試順利！

21. 本月2次

一個調(diào)查顯示經(jīng)常鍛煉的人更健康，所以我們可以通過建立體育館，來降低醫(yī)療保險

上月機經(jīng)4次

原題："Research indicates that those who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half as often as those who don’t exercise. By providing a well-equipped gym for Saluda’s municipal employees, we should be able to reduce the cost of our group health insurance coverage by approximately 50 percent and thereby achieve a balanced town budget."(106 or 108)

提供觀點：

1. There is no causal relationship between the development of the employees&apos health and the provision of a well-equipped gym.

2. Therore, the reduction of the cost of group health insurance coverage expected by the author is not guaranteed.

3. Even if the provision of the gym can cause a reduction of the cost, no one can rely on it to achieve a balanced town budget since the health incidents occur very randomly.

北美范文：

In this memo Saluda’s business manager recommends that the town provide a gym for its employees as a means of balancing the town’s budget. The manager reasons that since studies show that people who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half as often than those who don’t exercise, Saluda could save approximately 50% on the cost of its group health insurance coverage by providing its employees with a well-equipped gym. The savings on insurance would balance the town’s budget. The manager’s argument is unconvincing because it rests on several unsupported and dubious assumptions.

First, the manager assumes that Saluda’s employees will exercise regularly if a well-equipped facility is provided for them. This assumption is questionable since the mere fact that a gym is made available for employee use is no guarantee that they will avail themselves of it at all, let alone on a regular basis.

Second, the manager assumes that Saluda’s employees do not exercise regularly. Once again, the manager offers no support for this crucial assumption. Obviously, if all of Sauda’s employees already engage in daily exercise, the hospitalization rate will be unaffected by equipping an exercise facility and no savings will be realized on the group health insurance.

Third, the manager assumes that there is a direct relation between the hospitalization rate for employees and the cost of their group health insurance such that a reduction in the hospitalization rate will result in a corresponding reduction in the cost of insurance. While this may turn out to be true, the manager has failed to offer any evidence for this claim.

Finally, the manager assumes that the cost of building a well-equipped exercise facility will not negate the savings realized on the group health insurance. Until evidence has been provided to show that this is not the case, the manager’s plan is unacceptable.

In conclusion, the business manager’s proposal to provide an exercise facility as a means of balancing Saluda’s budget is not convincing. To strengthen the argument, evidence would have to be provided for each of the assumptions listed in the previous analysis.

22. 航空公司發(fā)現(xiàn)每1000個乘客里面有9個抱怨baggage handle所以航空公司認為1%的比例不會影響他們的goal-maintain and increase the number of passengers.

上月機經(jīng)2次

原題：The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum:

“On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia’s passengers.”（39）

提供觀點：

1去年是這樣今年呢以后呢？

2很有可能是乘客對服務不滿意卻沒時間正式申訴

3和別的航空公司比較如何seriousness trivailize

1， 沒有complaint不代表沒有不滿。

2， 沒有跟其他公司對比，同時并不知道總數(shù)。

北美范文：

The conclusion in this Avia Airlines memorandum is that a review of the airline’s baggage-handling procedures will not further its goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia passengers. The author’s line of reasoning is that the great majority of Avia passengers are happy with baggage handling at the airline because only one percent of passengers who traveled on Avia last year filed a complaint about Avia’s procedures. This argument is problematic in two important respects.

First, the argument turns on the assumption that the 99 percent of Avia passengers who did not complain were happy with the airline’s baggage-handling procedures. However, the author provides no evidence to support this assumption. The fact that, on the average, 9 out of 1000 passengers took the time and fort to formally complain indicates nothing about the experiences or attitudes of the remaining 991. It is possible that many passengers were displeased but too busy to formally complain, while others had no opinion at all. Lacking more complete information about passengers’ attitudes, we cannot assume that the great majority of passengers who did not complain were happy.

Secondly, in the absence of information about the number of passengers per flight and about the complaint records of competing airlines, the statistics presented in the memorandum might distort the seriousness of the problem. Given that most modern aircraft carry as many as 300 to 500 passengers, it is possible that Avia received as many as 4 or 5 complaints per flight. The author unfairly trivializes this record. Moreover, the author fails to compare Avia’s record with those of its competitors. It is possible that a particular competitor received virtually no baggage-handling complaints last year. If so, Avia’s one percent complaint rate might be significant enough to motivate customers to switch to another airline.

In conclusion, the author has failed to demonstrate that a review of the baggage-handling procedures at Avia Airlines is not needed to maintain or increase the number of Avia’s passengers. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least provide affirmative evidence that most Avia passengers last year were indeed happy with baggage-handling procedures. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the numbers of Avia passengers per flight last year and about the baggage-handling records of Avia’s competitors.

以上澳際留學為大家收集整理發(fā)布2011年GMAT機經(jīng)，以上2011年5月GMAT作文機經(jīng)，AA篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月11日，共36題。澳際留學祝同學們考試順利！

以下GMAT機經(jīng)為澳際留學獨家整理，轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處，若無注明發(fā)現(xiàn)必究!

以下GMAT機經(jīng)為澳際留學獨家整理，轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處，若無注明發(fā)現(xiàn)必究!

以下澳際留學獨家整理發(fā)布2011年GMAT機經(jīng)整理，以下2011年5月GMAT作文機經(jīng)，AA篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月11日，共36題。澳際留學祝同學們GMAT考試順利！

21. 本月2次

一個調(diào)查顯示經(jīng)常鍛煉的人更健康，所以我們可以通過建立體育館，來降低醫(yī)療保險

上月機經(jīng)4次

原題："Research indicates that those who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half as often as those who don’t exercise. By providing a well-equipped gym for Saluda’s municipal employees, we should be able to reduce the cost of our group health insurance coverage by approximately 50 percent and thereby achieve a balanced town budget."(106 or 108)

提供觀點：

1. There is no causal relationship between the development of the employees&apos health and the provision of a well-equipped gym.

2. Therore, the reduction of the cost of group health insurance coverage expected by the author is not guaranteed.

3. Even if the provision of the gym can cause a reduction of the cost, no one can rely on it to achieve a balanced town budget since the health incidents occur very randomly. 上1234567下

共7頁