澳際留學(xué)為正在備考GMAT的同學(xué)整理了gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年GMAT機(jī)經(jīng),以下2011年6月gmat作文AI機(jī)經(jīng),共39題,時間從2011年6月3日至2011年6月22日。澳際留學(xué)祝大家GMAT考試順利!
(34)本月機(jī)經(jīng) 6次 上月機(jī)經(jīng)9次
How fectively one learns from the class depends on the quality of other students more than the quality of teacher.
V2. How fectively we learn depend more on the other students in the classroom than on the teacher.
V3.how fectively one learn in the classroom depends more on the quality of the other students than depends on the quality of the teacher
V4. AI考的是問“how fectively one learning is fected by the quality of other students or the quality of teachers”問是同學(xué)的品質(zhì)對一個人的學(xué)習(xí)影響大,還是老師的品質(zhì)對一個人的影響大。
考古
V1,the fectiveness depends more on the quality of other students than the quality of the teacher.
V2.how fectiveness one learns in the classroom depends on the quality of the other students than the quality of the teacher.
V3 學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)效率相對于老師的質(zhì)量更多的取決于同學(xué)的的質(zhì)量;
V4讓學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)fectively, other students和teachers 哪個重要
V5 How fectively one learns in a classroom is determined more by the quality of other students than by the quality of the teacher. Agree or not?
(35)本月機(jī)經(jīng) 3次 上月機(jī)經(jīng)4次
No.5 “All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an fective way to get work done.”
5. “所有的團(tuán)體和組織都應(yīng)該作為一個每個人都參與決定,分享責(zé)任和義務(wù)的團(tuán)隊(duì)來運(yùn)作。給予一個人關(guān)于一個項(xiàng)目和行動的集中的權(quán)威和責(zé)任不是完成工作的有效方式。”
提供觀點(diǎn):
1. For groups and organizations that are stable, it is reasonable to have a flat organizational structure.
2. For groups and organizations that are always confronted with emergencies, it is always better to give one certain person central authority and responsibility.
3. It is hard to say that one structure is necessarily better than the other. They all have advantages and disadvantages. And it is a case-by-case discussion.
1, Admittedly, 在團(tuán)隊(duì)中,每個人都應(yīng)該起到積極的作用take positive action。責(zé)任和義務(wù)的share可以激發(fā)每個人更加主動motivate the members’ creativity and initiative. 比方說,many companies let the employees to buy shares and stocks.
2, 但是,這樣不是說,everyone should be given the power to make the final decision. 首先,天性是自私的。In many circumstances, the personal goal may be different from or even contrary to the goal of the group. 如果任由每個人作出決定,很可能作出相反的,產(chǎn)生很多矛盾。incompatible conflict. 比如企業(yè)中,每個員工都想爭取最多的工資,但也許與企業(yè)cost-cutting policy想矛盾。
3, 這時候,就需要one person with the authority and responsibility for a project來協(xié)調(diào)assort with the different interests。synthesize the various voices of all the group members and make the final decision.這樣才能有效地領(lǐng)導(dǎo)一個團(tuán)隊(duì),不會偏離最初的目標(biāo)stray from the initial goal of the task.
Thesis sentence: it is true that team work is the most familiar functional way that adopted by many groups and organizations. It is also true that every team member should share responsibilities and duties within the team. However, it is hardly true that the absence of central authority that enable everybody to make decisions is an fective way to get work done.
View1:compared with giving the responsibility for a task to one authoritative person, the sharing of responsibilities and duties among team members is a more fective way to get things done.
Evidence: the allocated responsibility and duties give workers the feeling of being important and necessary that motivated them to fulfill their work.
The fact that anyone who dose not accomplish his or her assigned work thus affect the whole progress of the project could be easily detected, gives the necessary pressure to workers that guarantee the ficiency thus the completion of the progect.
View2: the claim that the everybody decision making structure rather than central authority is a more fective way to get things down is unwarranted.
Evidence:
Everybody makes decisions totally no decisions.
Not everyone has acquired the essential abilities such as thorough analysis and foresighted prediction to make decisions.
北美范文:
Which is a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing all group members to share in the decision making, duties and responsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegate duties and take responsibility? The speaker’s opinion is that the first method is always the best one. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by two very different examples.
A jury in a criminal trial is good example of a group in which shared decision-making, duties, and responsibility is the most appropriate and fective way to get the job done. Each member of the jury is on equal footing with the others. While one person is appointed to head the jury, his or her function is to act as facilitator, not as leader. To place ultimate authority and responsibility on the facilitator would essentially be to appoint a judge, and to thereby deat the very purpose of the jury system.
By way of contrast, a trauma unit in a hospital is a case in which one individual should assume responsibility, delegate duties and make decisions. In trauma units, split-second 【split-second: adj.瞬間發(fā)生的】 decisions are inherently part of the daily routine, and it is generally easier for one person to make a quick decision than for a team to agree on how to proceed. One could argue that since decisions in trauma units are typically life-and-death (adj. 生死攸關(guān)的, 重大的) ones, leaving these decisions to one person is too risky. However, this argument ignores the crucial point that only the most experienced individuals should be trusted with such a burden and with such power; leaving decisions to inexperienced group members can jeopardize a patient’s very life.
In conclusion, I agree that in some situations the best way to accomplish a task is through teamwork-sharing responsibility, duties and decision making. However, in other situations, especially those where quick decisions are necessary or where individual experience is critical, the most fective means is for one individual to serve as leader and assume ultimate responsibility for completing the job.澳際留學(xué)為大家整理2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),以上2011年6月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng),AI,共39題,2011年6月3日至2011年6月22日。澳際留學(xué)祝大家考試順利!
gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),6月作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至6.22)(二十)gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),6月作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至6.22)(二十)gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),6月作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至6.22)(二十)gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),6月作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至6.22)(二十)gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),6月作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至6.22)(二十)澳際留學(xué)為正在備考GMAT的同學(xué)整理了gmat機(jī)經(jīng),2011年GMAT機(jī)經(jīng),以下2011年6月gmat作文AI機(jī)經(jīng),共39題,時間從2011年6月3日至2011年6月22日。澳際留學(xué)祝大家GMAT考試順利!
(34)本月機(jī)經(jīng) 6次 上月機(jī)經(jīng)9次
How fectively one learns from the class depends on the quality of other students more than the quality of teacher.
V2. How fectively we learn depend more on the other students in the classroom than on the teacher.
V3.how fectively one learn in the classroom depends more on the quality of the other students than depends on the quality of the teacher
V4. AI考的是問“how fectively one learning is fected by the quality of other students or the quality of teachers”問是同學(xué)的品質(zhì)對一個人的學(xué)習(xí)影響大,還是老師的品質(zhì)對一個人的影響大。
考古
V1,the fectiveness depends more on the quality of other students than the quality of the teacher.
V2.how fectiveness one learns in the classroom depends on the quality of the other students than the quality of the teacher.
V3 學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)效率相對于老師的質(zhì)量更多的取決于同學(xué)的的質(zhì)量;
V4讓學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)fectively, other students和teachers 哪個重要
V5 How fectively one learns in a classroom is determined more by the quality of other students than by the quality of the teacher. Agree or not? 上12345下
共5頁
閱讀全文Amy GUO 經(jīng)驗(yàn): 17年 案例:4539 擅長:美國,澳洲,亞洲,歐洲
本網(wǎng)站(www.innerlightcrystal.com,刊載的所有內(nèi)容,訪問者可將本網(wǎng)站提供的內(nèi)容或服務(wù)用于個人學(xué)習(xí)、研究或欣賞,以及其他非商業(yè)性或非盈利性用途,但同時應(yīng)遵守著作權(quán)法及其他相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,不得侵犯本網(wǎng)站及相關(guān)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利。除此以外,將本網(wǎng)站任何內(nèi)容或服務(wù)用于其他用途時,須征得本網(wǎng)站及相關(guān)權(quán)利人的書面許可,并支付報(bào)酬。
本網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容原作者如不愿意在本網(wǎng)站刊登內(nèi)容,請及時通知本站,予以刪除。
1、拔打奧際教育全國咨詢熱線: 400--601--0022 (8:00-24:00)。
2、點(diǎn)擊 【在線咨詢】,我們會有咨詢老師為您提供專業(yè)的疑難問題解答。
3、 【在線預(yù)約】咨詢,填寫表單信息,隨后我們會安排咨詢老師回訪。