2017年gmat機(jī)經(jīng),7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至7.20)(七).

　　澳際留學(xué)整理2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，下面是2011年7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)，AI共39題，2011年7月5日至7月20日。前1-24題見(jiàn) 2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng),7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至7.12)(一) 祝大家GMAT考試順利!

32. No.24 A powerful business leader has far more opportunity to influence the course of a community and a nation than does any government official

24. “一個(gè)有力的企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)比一個(gè)政府官員有更多的機(jī)會(huì)影響一個(gè)社團(tuán)或國(guó)家的方針?！?/p>

提供觀點(diǎn)：

1. 每一個(gè)政府官員都很難自己做出決策。每一個(gè)政令的頒布表面上仿佛是由一個(gè)人宣布的，其實(shí)背后的程序過(guò)程都是十分繁雜的。seperation of the three powers(the legislative, executive and judicial powers) In this work he argued that the three powers a state has are the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial and that for a state to remain democratic, these powers must be separated and there must be checks and balances to prevent a single group from acquiring control over two or more of them. 任何一個(gè)政府官員做出決定都可能受到上司甚至是同事的限制，即使是總統(tǒng)，其實(shí)也僅僅是他的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)班子共同商議做出結(jié)論，更何況三權(quán)分立在保護(hù)了民主的同時(shí)本身也限制了每個(gè)個(gè)人甚至是每個(gè)group的決策權(quán)利以及對(duì)國(guó)家和社區(qū)的影響。

2. 而企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)往往會(huì)有更大的決策權(quán)，而他們的決策也更容易被貫徹。在一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)為中心的國(guó)家相應(yīng)的他們的對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家的影響力也就更大。

3. 誠(chéng)然在一個(gè)以政治為中心的國(guó)家里，企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家產(chǎn)生影響的機(jī)會(huì)會(huì)較少，但經(jīng)濟(jì)是政治的基礎(chǔ)，離開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)政治是毫無(wú)影響力可言的。此外由于上面所說(shuō)過(guò)的原因政府官員對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家的影響同樣不會(huì)很大。

goverment order procedure process complex complicated intricate higher-up subordinate superior

restict restriction confine constrain curb administration collective the seperation of the three powers: the legislative the executive and the judicial decision-making carry out implement perform politics-centered economy-centered influence fect impact historical influential abound

on balance=with all things considered admittedly opportunity commerce commercial check-and-balance system 制約平衡制度 scandal illuminate illumination luminous lumination technic technical technology technician technological entity equity seems to pale next to...

Yet the impact seems to pale next to those of our modern captains of industry.

by virture of for the sake of on the account of

1. Admittedly, 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的作用有時(shí)不象企業(yè)家一樣apparent. 因?yàn)閲?guó)家的發(fā)展，人們的生活，與企業(yè)closely related. 比如GATES，領(lǐng)導(dǎo)了信息產(chǎn)業(yè)革命；Rockeller，控制國(guó)家的石油命脈took control of American oil supply。企業(yè)家通過(guò)影響企業(yè)的行為，從而直觀上影響人course of a community.

2. 但是，企業(yè)的一切影響is based on its existence, which is permitted by the government. 政府制定各種policy來(lái)允許企業(yè)的存在，企業(yè)家的一切行為需要被政府允許才能產(chǎn)生作用。

3. Moreover, 影響一個(gè)國(guó)家，需要強(qiáng)大的power, which can be only generated from absolutely authority. 這樣的絕對(duì)權(quán)力是企業(yè)不具備的。Yet even a cursory review of the history reveals substantial evidence that it is the government leader rather than the business leader that can make the pivotal decision when the nation is in crisis. 比如，在經(jīng)濟(jì)recession，企業(yè)的力量無(wú)法使經(jīng)濟(jì)好轉(zhuǎn)，revive the economy of the whole nation, 只有政府運(yùn)用行政措施，制定positive policy to stimulate the companies and thus the economy of the whole nation. 比如Roosevelt. Bill Clinton. financial policy

View 1: Unlike business leader, government power is likely to subject to many more restraints. Our check-and-balance system, the legislation influence and the voting power are all factors that temper the power of government official to the course of a community or a nation. Moreover, powerful business leaders all too often seem to hold the actual legislative and judicial power by their financial supporting of official activities such as governmental elections.

View2: While take more thorough consideration, the government official is likely to have more direct and broad influence on a community and a nation.

Evidence: various approach to influence other than financial approach

In addition the governmental official have the abilities to regulate commerce,

北美范文：

Historical examples of both influential public officials and influential business leaders abound. However, the power of the modern-era business leader is quite different from that of the government official. On balance, the CEO seems to be better positioned to influence the course of community and of nations.

Admittedly the opportunities for the legislator to regulate commerce or of the jurist to dictate rules of equity are official and immediate. No private individual can hold that brand of influence. Yet official power is tempered by our check-and-balance system (制約平衡制度) of government and, in the case of legislators, by the voting power of the electorate. Our business leaders are not so constrained, so, their opportunities far exceed those of any public official. Moreover, powerful business leaders all too often seem to hold de facto legislative and judicial power by way of their direct influence over public officials, as the Clinton Administration’s fund-raising scandal of 1997 illuminated all too well.

The industrial and technological eras have bred such moguls of capitalism as Pullman, Rockeller, Carnegie, and Gates, who by the nature of their industries and their business savvy, not by force of law, have transformed our economy, the nature of work, and our very day-to-day (adj. 日常的, 逐日的) existence. Of course, many modern-day public servants have made the most of their opportunities—for example, the crime-busting (bust: to break or smash especially with force;) mayor Rudolph Giuliani and the new-dealing President Franklin Roosevelt. Yet their impact seems to pale next to those of our modern captains of industry.

　　以上澳際留學(xué)整理2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，2011年7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)，AI共39題，2011年7月5日至7月20日。前1-24題見(jiàn) 2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng),7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至7.12)(一) 澳際留學(xué)祝大家考試順利!

　　澳際留學(xué)整理2011年gmat機(jī)經(jīng)，下面是2011年7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)，AI共39題，2011年7月5日至7月20日。前1-24題見(jiàn) 2011gmat機(jī)經(jīng),7月gmat作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI(至7.12)(一) 祝大家GMAT考試順利!

32. No.24 A powerful business leader has far more opportunity to influence the course of a community and a nation than does any government official

24. “一個(gè)有力的企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)比一個(gè)政府官員有更多的機(jī)會(huì)影響一個(gè)社團(tuán)或國(guó)家的方針?！?/p>

提供觀點(diǎn)：

1. 每一個(gè)政府官員都很難自己做出決策。每一個(gè)政令的頒布表面上仿佛是由一個(gè)人宣布的，其實(shí)背后的程序過(guò)程都是十分繁雜的。seperation of the three powers(the legislative, executive and judicial powers) In this work he argued that the three powers a state has are the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial and that for a state to remain democratic, these powers must be separated and there must be checks and balances to prevent a single group from acquiring control over two or more of them. 任何一個(gè)政府官員做出決定都可能受到上司甚至是同事的限制，即使是總統(tǒng)，其實(shí)也僅僅是他的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)班子共同商議做出結(jié)論，更何況三權(quán)分立在保護(hù)了民主的同時(shí)本身也限制了每個(gè)個(gè)人甚至是每個(gè)group的決策權(quán)利以及對(duì)國(guó)家和社區(qū)的影響。

2. 而企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)往往會(huì)有更大的決策權(quán)，而他們的決策也更容易被貫徹。在一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)為中心的國(guó)家相應(yīng)的他們的對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家的影響力也就更大。

3. 誠(chéng)然在一個(gè)以政治為中心的國(guó)家里，企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家產(chǎn)生影響的機(jī)會(huì)會(huì)較少，但經(jīng)濟(jì)是政治的基礎(chǔ)，離開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)政治是毫無(wú)影響力可言的。此外由于上面所說(shuō)過(guò)的原因政府官員對(duì)社區(qū)和國(guó)家的影響同樣不會(huì)很大。 上1234下

共4頁(yè)